How many physicists do we need? A Brazilian point of view

Autores

  • Karina Waiswol Boccaletti AC Camargo Cancer Center
  • Adriana Aparecida Flosi
  • Ana Paula Vollet Cunha
  • Cassio de Queiroz Tannous
  • Jeam Haroldo Oliveira
  • Amanda Burg Rech

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2021.v15.19849001585

Palavras-chave:

medical physics, radiation therapy, staff calculation, full-time equivalence.

Resumo

In Brazil the hiring of medical physics in radiation therapy (RT) departments is defined by regulatory agencies, considering only the number of patients treated. With the rise of new technologies, treatment techniques become more complex, requiring a greater amount of time and staff qualifications. International organizations solved this problem with a method for assessing personnel levels and determining the quantity of professionals required for a specific RT department. In this work, we adapted this strategy to our clinical reality and derived calculations of the time per task multiplied by the expected number of tasks. The task requirements were described in detail and the amounts of time required to perform each task over a one-year period were determined. The sum of task times were related to a suitable full-time equivalence (FTE), considering a team only of medical physicists. We thus determined that our clinic should have 11 FTE personnel, evidencing a need for hiring. The use of a personnel justification grid enables the demonstration of professional staffing insufficiencies in clinics, a condition that hinders the development of RT departments, including the scope of teaching and research.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Comissão Nacional de Segurança Nuclear. Requisitos de Segurança e Proteção Radiológica para Serviços de Radioterapia 2017.

http://appasp.cnen.gov.br/seguranca/normas/pdf/Nrm610.pdf

Ministério da Saúde. Resolução-RDC Nº 20 2006. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2006/rdc0020_02_02_2006.html

Ford EC, Fong de Los Santos L, Pawlicki T, Sutlief S, Dunscombe P. Consensus recommendations for incident learning database structures in radiation oncology. Med Phys. 2012; 39(12):7272-90.

Mills MD. Analysis and practical use: the abt study of medical physicist work values for radiation oncology physics services – round II. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005; 2(9):782-9.

Mills MD, Spanos WJ, Jose BO, Kelly BA, Brill JP. Preparing a cost analysis for the section of medical physics-guidelines and methods. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2000; 1(2):76-85.

Eudaldo T, Huizenga H, Lamm IL, et al. Guidelines for education and training of medical physicists in radiotherapy. Recommendations from an ESTRO/EFOMP working group. Radiother Oncol. 2004; 70(2):125-35.

International Atomic Energy Agency. Human Health Campus 2015

https://humanhealth.iaea.org/HHW/RadiationOncology/Makingthecaseforradiotherapyinyourcountry/Roleofradiotherapyincancercare/Staffingandcostcalculation/index.html.

Accessed March 9, 2020.

Klein EE. A grid to facilitate physics staffing justification. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010; 11(1):2987.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-05-06

Como Citar

Waiswol Boccaletti, K., Flosi, A. A., Vollet Cunha, A. P., de Queiroz Tannous, C., Oliveira, J. H., & Burg Rech, A. (2021). How many physicists do we need? A Brazilian point of view. Revista Brasileira De Física Médica, 15, 585. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2021.v15.19849001585

Edição

Seção

Artigo Original