Comparison of methodologies for dosimetric characterization of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in radiotherapy

Autores

  • Camila Soares Aguiar Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - FMUSP
  • Fernanda G. Biagioni Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2026.v20.19849001891

Palavras-chave:

quality control, flattening filter-free beams, radiotherapy, TrueBeam

Resumo

The introduction of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in radiotherapy has brought significant benefits, including increased dose rates and reduced treatment delivery times. However, the modification of the dose profile resulting from the removal of the flattening filter limits the direct application of traditional quality control parameters developed for conventional beams. In this scenario, different approaches have been proposed for the dosimetric characterization of FFF beams. In this study, three methodologies described in the literature were evaluated and compared: the Fogliata (FG) method: profile renormalization; the Sharma (SH) method: inflection point; and the Budgell (BDG) method: virtual flattening filter. The analysis was performed for 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF photon beams generated by a TrueBeam linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), considering parameters such as symmetry, field size, penumbra, and degree of unflatness. The results demonstrated good agreement among the evaluated methodologies. Differences in penumbra values were below 0.7 mm across all field sizes, and symmetry values remained within 1% for all measurements, complying with recommended tolerances. Field size differences were within ±1.2 mm relative to nominal values, also within established clinical limits. The unflatness parameter showed consistent behavior with literature data, with variations dependent on field size and beam energy. Among the evaluated approaches, the SH method was identified as the most suitable for clinical routine, as it preserves the intrinsic characteristics of FFF beams while providing reliable and consistent dosimetric parameters.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

1. Pönisch F, Titt U, Vassiliev ON, Kry SF, Mohan R. Properties of unflattened photon beams shaped by a multileaf collimator. Med Phys. 2006 Jun;33(6):1738-46.

2. Vassiliev ON, Titt U, Pönisch F, Kry SF, Mohan R, Gillin MT. Dosimetric properties of photon beams from a flattening filter free clinical accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Apr 7;51(7):1907-17.

3. Cashmore J. The characterization of unflattened photon beams from a 6 MV linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Abr 7;53(7):1933-46.

4. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin FF, Simon W, Dresser S, et al. Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4197-212.

5. Fogliata A, Garcia R, Knöös T, Nicolini G, Clivio A, Vanetti E, et al. Definition of parameters for quality assurance of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2012 Oct;39(10):6455-64.

6. Sharma SD, Sahani G, Dash Sharma PK, Deshpande DD, Negi PS, Sathianarayanan VK, et al. Acceptance criteria for flattening filter-free photon beam from standard medical electron linear accelerator: AERB task group recommendations.J Med Phys. 2014 Oct-Dec;39(4):206-11.

7. Budgell G, Berresford J, Bunce C, Davies J, Flynn S, Hardy M, et al. IPEM topical report 1: guidance on implementing flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2016 Dec 21;61(24):8360-94.

8. Khan, F. M. The Physics of Radiation Therapy. 3 edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkin, 2010. 44-45.

9. International Atomic Energy Agency. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy. Vienna: IAEA; 2000. (Technical Reports Series No. 398).

10. Glide-Hurst C, Bellon M, Foster R, Altunbas C, Speiser M, Altman M, et al. Commissioning of the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator: A multi-institutional study. Med Phys. 2013 Mar;40(3):031719.

11. Clivio A, Belosi MF, Cozzi L, Nicolini G, Vanetti E, Bolard G, et al. On the determination of reference levels for quality assurance of flattening filter free photon beams in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2014 Jan;41(1):011711.

12. Pichandi A, Ganesh KM, Jerina A, Balaji K, Kilara G. Analysis of physical parameters and determination of inflection point for Flattening Filter Free beams in medical linear accelerator. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014 Sep-Oct;19(5):322-31.

13. Bueno KP. Controle de qualidade em feixes de fótons de megavoltagem de alta intensidade, flattening filter free (FFF) [dissertação]. Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; 2017.

14. Sharma S, Dixit DK, Sharma SD, Sharma A, Sahani G, Upreti RR, et al. A Simplified Approach for Determination of Inflection Points of Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beam Using In-House Developed Software and Derivation of Reference Levels. J Med Phys. 2023 Jul-Set;48(3):259-67.

15. Furnari, L. Controle de qualidade em radioterapia. Crayon Editorial, 2021. 624-625

Downloads

Publicado

2026-06-16

Como Citar

Soares Aguiar, C., & Biagioni, F. G. (2026). Comparison of methodologies for dosimetric characterization of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in radiotherapy. Revista Brasileira De Física Médica, 20, 891. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2026.v20.19849001891

Edição

Seção

Artigo Original

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.