Comparison between thermoluminescent dosimeters and semiconductor diodes applied for in vivo dosimetry of TBI treatments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2023.v17.19849001707

Keywords:

TBI, Semiconductor Diodes, TLD, Thermoluminescent, In Vivo Dosimetry

Abstract

This paper presents a quantitative comparison between thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and semiconductor diodes
applied for in vivo dosimetry of total body irradiation (TBI) treatments. Measurements were performed in order to express
the detectors ability to estimate the absorbed dose on the central axis of a solid water phantom, using two different
calculation methods. The first method uses the average of the dose values at the entrance and exit surfaces of the
phantom to estimate the dose on its central axis. In the second method, the estimate is performed through the dose value
at the phantom entrance surface applied to an equation that considers the tissue phantom ratio (TPR) and the inverse
square law of the distance. For semiconductor diodes, average deviations of 5.1% were found for the first calculation
method and 1.6% for the second method, while for TLDs, average deviations of 1.6% were found for the first calculation
method and 2% for the second method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Clifford Chao KS, Perez CA , Brady LW. Radiation Oncology

Management Decisions. 1999.

Su F, Shi C, Papanikolaou N. Clinical application of

GAFCHROMIC ebt film for in vivo dose measurements of total

body irradiation radiotherapy. 2008

Knoll GF, Radiation Detection and Measurement. 1989.

Johns HE, Cunningham JR. The Physics of Radiology. 1983.

Sánchez-Doblado F, Terrón JA, Sánchez-Nieto B, Arráns R,

Errazquin L, Biggs D, Lee C, Núnez L, Delgado A, Muniz JL.

Verification of an on line in vivo semiconductor dosimetry

system for TBI with two TLD procedures. 1994.

Dutch MA, Ginjaume M, Chakkor H, Ortega X, Jornet N, Ribas

M. Thermoluminescence dosimetry applied to in vivo dose

measurements for total body irradiation techniques. 1998.

sevrrabr.foroiberam.org [homepage on the Internet]

IAEA. Review of Radiation Oncology Physics. 2003.

Neto FM, Nolasco AV, Malta LN. Energia efetiva do acelerador

linear Precise 6 MV. 2017.

Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, Huq MS, Kanai T, Smyth FV,

Vynckier S. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam

Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry

based on Standards of Absorbed Dose to Water. 2006.

Best S, Ralston A, Suchowierska N. Clinical application of the

OneDose Patient Dosimetry System for total body irradiation.

Tapper PB, Bedford PA, Davis F. Physical aspects of

total-body irradiation at the Middlesex Hospital. 1993

Jornet RM, Eudaldo N, Carabante T, Duch MA, Ginjaume M,

Segura G, Sanchez-Doblado F. Midplane dose determination

during total body irradiation using in vivo dosimetry. 1998

Vrtar M, Kovacevic N. A model of in vivo dosimetry and quality

assurance analysis of total body irradiation in Zagreb. 1998.

Oliveira FF, Amaral LL, Costa AM, Netto TG. In

vivo dosimetry with silicon diodes in total body irradiation.

Published

2023-09-12

How to Cite

Lalli, H., Brüning, F., Malthez, A., Wozniak, G., Oliveria, C., Ricardi, E., Funchal, M., & Fernandes, T. (2023). Comparison between thermoluminescent dosimeters and semiconductor diodes applied for in vivo dosimetry of TBI treatments. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 17, 707. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2023.v17.19849001707

Issue

Section

Artigo Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)