Evaluation of the improvement of image quality in dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2024.v18.19849001759

Keywords:

Digital mammography, Dual-energy imaging, Monte Carlo, Image quality, contrast-enhanced digital mammography

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) has been employed as a complementary imaging examination to digital mammography, especially in more complex cases such as dense breasts, due to its enhanced sensitivity and specificity. This examination encompasses two main techniques: dual-energy and temporal. Both utilize X-ray spectra with higher energies than those in digital mammography and involve a double exposure of the breast, necessitating justification for its usage. In this study, the Monte Carlo method with the PENELOPE code (v. 2018) + PenEasy (v. 2020) was employed to simulate radiation transport and image acquisition for digital mammography and CEDM in the dual-energy technique. The goal was to compare and quantify differences in the image qualities of these modalities. Breast simulations considered phantoms with a homogeneous distribution of glandular and adipose tissue, using anthropomorphic voxelized breast models generated computationally through the VICTRE platform. Both models included lesions within the breast, composed of glandular tissue and iodinated contrast with varying concentrations for simulating digital mammography and CEDM, respectively. Quantitative image analyses were conducted based on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Results demonstrated a significant improvement of up to 10 times for homogeneous breasts and 4.5 times for the anthropomorphic model in image quality with CEDM, justifying its usage. The degree of lesion enhancement depends on breast glandularity and the concentration of the iodinated contrast solution used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

de Oliveira Santos M, et al. Estimativa 2023: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2023.

FerlayJ. et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. International Journal of Cancer. 2021;149(4): 178-789.

Bick U, Diekmann F. Digital Mammography. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.

Diekmann F. and Bick, U Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. European radiology. 2007; 17(12): 3086-92

Okuno E, Youshimura E. Física das radiações. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos; 2010.

MJ Yaffe. et al. The myth of the 50‐50 breast. Medical physics. 2009; 36(12): 5437-5443.

Salvat F. PENELOPE-2018: A code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. Workshop Proceedings.Barcelona, Spain, 2019.

Sempau J., Badal A. and Brualla, L. A PENELOPE-based system for the automated Monte Carlo simulation of clinacs and voxelized geometries-application to far-from-axis fields. Medical Physics. 2011;38(11): 5887-5895.

Massera RT. and Tomal, A. Mamografia Digital: estudos dosimétricos e de qualidade da imagem por simulação Monte Carlo. Revista Brasileira de Física Médica. 2019;13(1): 154-161.

Hernandez AM., Seibert JA., NosratiehA. and Boone JM. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra. Medical physics, 2017;44(6), 2148-2160.

Routine to calculate the Half Value Layer (HVL), effective energy and average energy of a spectrum. 2022 [cited 2023 October 31]. Available from: https://github.com/gfrmd-ifgw/hvl_calculator

C Fedon, et al. Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient‐based characterization of the breast parenchyma. Medical Physics. 2021;48(3): 1436-1447.

Graff CG. A new, open-source, multi-modality digital breast phantom. Medical Imaging 2016: Physics of Medical Imaging. SPIE, 2016; 9783: 72-81.

D Sharma, et al. In silico imaging tools from the VICTRE clinical trial. Medical Physics. 2019; 46(9): 3924-3928.

Puong, S, et al. Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling. SPIE 6510, Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical maging. SPIE, 2007; 6510: 864-875.

Published

2024-04-01

How to Cite

Gomes H S, M., & Tomal, A. (2024). Evaluation of the improvement of image quality in dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Brazilian Journal of Medical Physics, 18, 759. https://doi.org/10.29384/rbfm.2024.v18.19849001759

Issue

Section

Artigo Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)